Monday, August 28, 2017

Gender in Research: Framework and Methodologies

by Ma. Rosette San Buenaventura

Dr. Odine Maria M. de Guzman, director of the UP Center for Women’s and Gender Studies, talked about Gender-Sensitivity Research at Research Conversations last 25th of August 2017. The event was organized by UPOU’s Office of the Vice Chancellor for Academic Affairs in partnership with the Office of Gender Concerns. It was a two-part talk that discussed concepts on gender and gender research. 




The speaker started the talk with determining what the researcher’s disposition should be when doing gender research. The researcher must be open-minded, adaptable, flexible, and most of all, gender-sensitive. Dr. Odine proceeded to define gender as “socially-ascribed and socially-learned sense of what and who we are” and that it is different from sex which is understood to be biologically determined. She also differentiated gender roles from sex roles such that the former are tasks, functions, or characteristics that a society or culture defines as female or male, while the latter are biological or occupational function for which a necessary qualification is to belong to one particular sex category. 

Dr. Odine also defined and discussed gender issues. These issues arise when there is notable gender inequality  in real world situations such as gender relations and roles, gender division of labor, organizational structures, programs and services, and laws and government directives. Sexism and discrimination were mentioned as examples of this. Gender stereotypes were defined as a widely accepted overly simplified judgment or bias about a person or group. These gender issues impact individuals in such a way that “gender roles, expectations, and perceptions categorize and limit women and men into situations that constrain their capacity to do and capacity to be, hindering their potential to attain a full and satisfying life”.

Dr. Odine went on to tackle gender-sensitive research. A common misconception about gender research is that it is solely about women or gender relationships. Also, contrary to traditional research, it does not operate on assumptions of homogeneity. It takes into account gender as a significant variable in the research context and in the whole research process. It recognizes that the sexes have different roles and impact to society, power and power relations among the sexes and genders, and the differences in genders and gives equal value to each. 

Engendering research, as Dr. Odine put it, presents new perspectives, raises new questions, and uses new analytical tools to create a better understanding of a situation. Moreover, it can improve relevance, coverage, and quality of research. Engendering research also contributes to empowering groups through the use of more participatory methodologies, presenting and valuing the experiences of marginalized groups, and better policy formation. Dr. Odine reiterated that an actual research must mainstream gender throughout the research process from identifying the problem down to the dissemination of the research results. She gave important points to consider when doing gender research such as acknowledge own bias, use a conceptual framework that could reflect the experiences of sexes and genders, formulate a gender sensitive research question, among others.

Friday, August 18, 2017

InnovaTE

by Ma. Rosette San Buenaventura

Research Conversations' featured speaker for the InnovaTE Flagship Program is Dr. Sheila R Bonito. 



InnovaTE promotes the adoption and/or adaption of innovative technology-supported teaching methodologies in support of effective learning. Its performance indicators were enumerated as such: (1) innovative technology-supported teaching methodologies; (2) enhanced capacity in effective online teaching among the faculty; and (3) reduced attrition and improved graduation rates among students. Its initial components consist of: (1) online teaching toolkit available in the Faculty Portal website; (2) faculty seminar-workshop/webinar series; (3) online teaching skills certification program; and (4) FIC and Tutor Congress.

Dr. Sheila expounded on the Faculty Portal website, noting that it is still under development but is already up and running. The website is designed to house modules for FICs and Open Educational Resources (OERs) as an effort to collate, organize, and present available content. However, at the moment, only modules for course authors are available and can already be retrieved at faculty.icodel.org. Webinars and workshops on open educational practices, OER in Education, extent of use of OER in UPOU, and OER in Health have been conducted with many more to come. Dr. Sheila provided websites such as roer4d.org and oerhub.com as sample resources on OERs and open education studies, data sets, etc.  

By the end of the conversation, a call for continued research on open education and OERs and for other research topic suggestions was raised. The audience also voiced out their concerns on how resources such as student theses repository and data sets can be made accessible for everyone. It comes as existing policies like the Data Privacy Act limits practitioners to make their work available for all. 


Friday, August 11, 2017

Institutionalizing Gender Perspective in Research: Reflexivity as an Alternative

by Ma. Rosette B. San Buenaventura

Research Conversations featured Institutionalizing Gender Perspective in Research: Reflexivity as an Alternative, a study by Dr. Primo Garcia, Luisa Gelisan and Paula Muyco. 




The talk covered legal instruments to further strengthen gender and development (GAD) efforts such as Former President Fidel V. Ramos’ Memo Order 282 indicating that the academe must mainstream gender in its practices and/or to incorporate GAD issues in its programs and CHED’s Memo Order No. 01 stating that all private and public higher education institutions to mainstream gender in research, administration, extension, and curriculum.

In response to this, UPOU has institutionalized the Gender-focused Research Grants which are given to proposed studies that have GAD components or are gender-focused after undergoing the review and endorsement process of the research and publication committee. The results of these studies are expected and required to be disseminated in a forum, conference, and colloquium and/or published in a reputable academic publication. Also, UPOU has engendered the institution’s teaching, research, and public service activities to uphold equality in women and men and fulfill and promote women’s human rights and development

 The talk also touched on reactions to Gender Component requirement in research – these being acquiescence and resistance. Acquiescence was defined as taking a step towards gender mainstreaming, but not enough to facilitate deeper understanding of gender issues and realities, while resistance was defined as force-fitting gender perspective, action or inaction by people,  or obvious or implied opposition. These reactions can also be used as parameters to determine the visibility or invisibility of gender in research and the success or failure of gender policies and institutions. To address this issue, reflexivity in research is proposed.

Reflexivity in research can be used (1) to look into how a research topic is anchored on issues of dominance, gender, sexuality, class, age, and race; (2) to determine both perspectives from marginalized sectors and researchers’ values, beliefs, interests, ambitions, and how it shapes research; (3) as a reaction/response to intimate questions and answers brought by doing gender-based research; (4) as an approach to better analyze the process and results of research. In addition to the existing GAD checklist for research, the study presented a framework featuring reflexivity to better guide researchers in pursuing GAD research.

During the forum, a discourse took place as a means to better understand reflexivity as an approach in research. On one hand, there is a concern on the difficulty of achieving reflexivity because academics have been trained and expected to be as objective as possible, throwing away their biases and personal underpinnings and assumptions. On the other, it is believed that academics have a responsibility to acknowledge and practice reflexivity as an alternative approach to gender-based research. With this, there is a call to action for younger and starting researchers to embrace reflexivity and pursue research in such a way that conjuncts the reflexivity in qualitative with the rigor of quantitative research.

To close the conversation, and question-and-answer activity was facilitated where the participants were requested to reflect on the research/es that they have done and answer the following questions: (1) Was the research gender-focused?, (2) If not, what could have been a gender component in the research?